Anna Sinclair Rogers vs Madison Brengle Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 05:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Sinclair Rogers vs M. Brengle

USA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rogers 0 - 0 Brengle
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rogers | 0 |
| Brengle | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
A. S. Rogers vs M. Brengle H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Titles | 22 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. S. Rogers vs M. Brengle Match Preview:
- How well do players perform on their second serve recently? Madison Brengle secures 35.96% of points, while Anna Sinclair Rogers achieves 42.73%, suggesting a stronger second serve for Rogers.
- When it comes to returning, Brengle excels on opponents' second serves with a 56.52% win rate, whereas Rogers manages 47.93%. This could give Brengle a key advantage in breaking serves.
- Comparing first serve returns, Brengle edges slightly ahead with 36.23% over Rogers' 34.85%, offering a minor advantage.
- Under pressure, Rogers is more capable, saving 52.43% of breakpoints, over Brengle’s 47.41%, indicating resilience.
- Who has the better match-winning record in the last year? Brengle has secured 65% of her matches, while Rogers has won 56.16%, favoring Brengle’s overall performance.
- On their favored surfaces, both players excel on hard surfaces, each winning 59% of their matches, demonstrating an equal advantage in such conditions.
- The players differ in tour levels, with Brengle winning 68.42% of her matches in Challengers/ITF > $10K, compared to Rogers’ 57.14%, highlighting Brengle’s consistency at this level.
- Brengle has faced opponents with an average rank of 440.9 over the last year, meanwhile, Rogers faced slightly higher-ranked opponents averaging 399.92, showcasing her experience against tougher competitors.
- In deciding sets, Rogers has a higher win rate, capturing 67% compared to Brengle's 50%, suggesting Rogers’ endurance in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the current form and specific statistical edges held by each player, Anna Sinclair Rogers demonstrates a slight advantage with her higher success rate on second serves and her ability to save breakpoints under pressure. These factors could be critical in pivotal moments during the match.
However, Madison Brengle's excellent return game, specifically against second serves, along with her higher match-winning percentage over the past year, underlines her strength in consistently securing matches. This makes her a formidable opponent, especially if she can leverage this strength effectively throughout the match.
Considering the surface on which they excel equally, the deciding factor may rely on who can best capitalize on minor advantages during play. Yet, Rogers’ superior record in deciding sets may give her the edge if the match goes the distance.
Overall, while both players display significant strengths, Madison Brengle’s consistency over the past year and strong return performance may make her slightly more favored to clinch victory in this matchup.
Anna Sinclair Rogers vs Madison Brengle Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
A. S. Rogers Recent Matches Played
M. Brengle Recent Matches Played

A. S. Rogers vs M. Brengle Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.43% (584/451) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.92% (1322/1042) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 52.77% (11201/10024) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.30% (357/245) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.26% (127/116) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.00% (55/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (45/45) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 310 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1624 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 120.62 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 71% (31515/44192) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (18028/31515) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5636/12681) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (3011/6162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 48% (21441/44606) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 37.27% (41/69) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40.26% (31/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 48.09% (113/122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 64.83% (389/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 76.92% (10/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (570/1009) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (97/177) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (146/307) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (608/517) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (608/90) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (426/65) |